900 rue Saint-Jacques, Montréal

Marketed as Skyla (residential) and Moxy Montréal (hotel). Borough of Ville-Marie, lot 1 179 341, 200 metres, 63 storeys. Research current to 14 September 2026.

Where the records live

Before any of this could be written, it was worth establishing which authority governs what, and which of those records a member of the public can actually open. In Montréal, land-use power is split: the city sets the height doctrine, the borough writes the zoning, and the province holds title and contamination data behind its own doors.

• Cadastre and parcel geometry — Cadastre du Québec (MERN), lot 1 179 341. Open viewer.
• Title and ownership chain — Registre foncier du Québec. Paywalled, per-search fee.
• Assessment roll — rôle d'évaluation foncière (Evalweb). Open.
• Contamination and environment — MELCCFP Répertoire des terrains contaminés; Ville de Montréal GIS. Open.
• Heritage and protection — Répertoire du patrimoine culturel du Québec and the Plan d'urbanisme protected-views regime. Open. No designation on this lot, but the mont Royal viewshed governs it.
• Zoning — Règlement d'urbanisme de Ville-Marie (01-282). Open, French, PDF only.
• Area and city plans — PPU Quartier des gares (2016); Plan d'urbanisme 2004 §5.1.1, superseded by PUM 2050 (2025). Open.
• Permits and conflict records — Ville de Montréal permit data; CCU de Ville-Marie avis and conseil d'arrondissement procès-verbaux. Partially open; agendas published as PDF.
• Historical mapping, press and market data — BAnQ Numérique (Goad's atlas, Lovell's directories); La Presse, Journal Métro, Radio-Canada, Canadian Architect; rentals.ca, PadMapper, Zumper, apartments.com, Google Business reviews.

The single most important document in this story — the March 2020 opinion of Ville-Marie's planning advisory committee — sits in that PDF agenda pile, and everything below reads it through the journalists who read it first.

The short version

For roughly sixty years, 900 rue Saint-Jacques was a hole in downtown Montréal. A surface parking lot, wedged between the rail viaduct carrying trains out of Central Station and the access ramps of the Ville-Marie expressway, on a block nobody wanted because the infrastructure had made it unlivable.

In 2019 and 2020, a family developer called Groupe Canvar proposed filling it with a 62-storey tower of roughly 810 apartments — fifty-two of which had two bedrooms, and none of which had three.

Ville-Marie's planning advisory committee looked at the drawings and said, in writing, that the building was not good enough to stand among its neighbours, and that the developer should go hire a design consultant.

That one advisory opinion is the reason the building standing there today is clad in sculpted precast concrete instead of glass, and the reason it has collected a Governor General's Medal, a Canadian Architect Award of Excellence, and the admiration of a profession that rarely admires rental towers.

The city's leverage worked exactly as designed — on the façade, on the unit mix, on the silhouette against the mountain. And it ended at the property line. The 3.2-star rating the building now carries has nothing to do with the architecture. It is about what happens after a tenant signs, and about a rail line the design press calls an asset and the residents call a three-in-the-morning problem.

The site canvas

Four parcels tell the story of this stretch, and three of the four were parking lots within the last decade.

• 900 rue Saint-Jacques, the subject — built and occupied 2025–26. 63 storeys, 200 m. Moxy hotel in the podium, roughly 681 to 700 rental units above. Developer: Canvar.
• 700 rue Saint-Jacques, Victoria sur le Parc — completed 2023, opened 2025. 58 storeys, 200 m, about 400 units. Broccolini.
• 800 rue Saint-Jacques, Place Banque Nationale — completed 2023. 40 storeys, 200 m. Broccolini, with Menkès Shooner Dagenais LeTourneux.
• The former Terminus Mansfield, across the street at the foot of Place Bonaventure — preliminary green light from the planning committee in March 2024 for a 200 m tower of about 664 units. Broccolini. The bus terminal closed once the REM opened; it is a parking lot today.

The parcel

Site and ownership

Lot 1 179 341 sits at the corner of rue Saint-Jacques and rue de l'Inspecteur, pressed directly against the bridge-building that carries trains out of Gare Centrale, with a Ville-Marie tunnel ramp on one side and the Place Bonaventure access ramp behind.

Groupe Canvar acquired it around 2019. The figure that circulates for the purchase is $44 million, though that number appears only in secondary project records and has not been confirmed against the Registre foncier — a search that costs money and would settle it.

Canvar is a family firm that has been building downtown since 1975: C-Loft, 400 Sherbrooke Ouest, Mille Neuf Bleury, a Hilton Garden Inn, a Marriott Courtyard. When La Presse reached vice-president Richard Varadi by email in April 2021, he declined to comment, saying he was waiting on a signed agreement with a hotel brand before going public.

One oddity worth noting: the architectural press consistently lists the client as Rimap Development rather than Canvar. The relationship between the two entities is not spelled out anywhere public.

Origin story

This lot's story is a negative one. It is defined by what was taken away rather than by what was ever built.

La Presse reported in 2021 that the parcel had sat vacant for six decades, which places its clearing in roughly the early 1960s — the same window in which Place Ville-Marie (1962), the Tour de la Bourse, Place Bonaventure (1964–67) and the reconstruction of the rail and expressway network remade this entire quadrant of the city.

The wider pattern is well documented. Rue Saint-Jacques was Canada's financial spine — St. James Street, where the banks were. Then the head offices began drifting to Toronto, the business core migrated northwest to Place Ville-Marie at the turn of the 1960s, and the construction of the autoroute Ville-Marie in the early 1970s severed Old Montréal from the new downtown, accelerating the abandonment and degradation of the buildings along that seam.

Whatever stood on lot 1 179 341 went down somewhere in that churn, and nothing replaced it — because the finished condition, rail viaduct on one flank and highway ramp on the other, was commercially unusable for anything except parked cars.

Across the street, the Terminus Mansfield absorbed South Shore buses arriving over the Champlain Bridge until the REM made it redundant. It is a parking lot today too, waiting on its own tower.

What the rules allowed

The governing instruments here are the PPU Quartier des gares (2016), sitting over Ville-Marie's zoning bylaw 01-282, under the city's Plan d'urbanisme.

The height regime is the interesting part, and it is more specific than the shorthand suggests. Since the 1992 Plan d'urbanisme, Montréal has capped buildings at the lower of two numbers: 232.5 metres above mean sea level — approximately the summit of mont Royal — or 200 metres of roof height measured from grade. The rule protects views of the mountain and keeps the downtown massif visually distinct from it.

Because this corner sits on some of the lowest ground downtown, it is one of the very few parcels in the city where the full 200 metres is physically reachable without breaching the mountain ceiling. That is the entire reason a 63-storey building is possible here and would not be three blocks north.

The delta between what was allowed and what was built is effectively zero. The tower was constructed to the ceiling: 200 metres, 63 storeys, the envelope consumed entirely.

One postscript on the rules themselves. The 200-metre roof-height cap was removed in the PUM 2050, adopted in 2025. The mont Royal elevation restriction remains.

Physical constraints

• An active rail corridor on one flank — the bridge-building out of Gare Centrale, including overnight maintenance.
• The autoroute Ville-Marie tunnel ramp and the Place Bonaventure access ramp adjacent.
• The protected mont Royal viewshed, which is the binding constraint on massing.
• No heritage designation on the lot.

Site timeline

1672 — rue Saint-Jacques is opened.

Over the next three centuries, the street becomes Canada's financial spine and then loses it. Sun Life and others begin the drift to Toronto; the business core migrates to Place Ville-Marie.

c. 1960–67 — the site is cleared. Place Ville-Marie, Place Bonaventure and the rail and expressway reconstruction remake the quadrant around it.

For the next sixty years, nothing. Surface parking. The autoroute Ville-Marie, driven through in the early 1970s, finishes the job of isolating the block. No project is proposed because no project pencils.

2016 — the PPU Quartier des gares is adopted. The city formally designates this district — transit-rich, full of vacant lots, starved of public realm — as an area of change.

c. 2019 — Canvar acquires the lot and moves quickly to file.

10 March 2020 — Ville-Marie councillors receive the planning committee's opinion. The committee finds the proposal lacks the quality and presence of the tall buildings around it, tells the developer to return to the drawing board and hire a design consultant, and asks for family-sized apartments. The borough declines to comment publicly, calling the file too preliminary.

Over the following year, the revision. The developer accepts the conditions: a more slender massing, a high-quality precast concrete envelope with fine aggregate, an increased share of three-bedroom units. The changes also reduce the project's impact on the protected view of the mountain. In the background, the city's 20/20/20 inclusionary regulation is moving toward adoption, and housing groups are publicly describing developers as being in a race against the clock.

1 April 2021 — the Règlement pour une métropole mixte takes effect.

24 April 2021 — La Presse reports the permit has been issued: a 216-room hotel in the lower sixteen storeys, 681 apartments from the 17th to the 62nd, 117 parking spaces, 305 bicycle spaces. The hotel operator is not yet named.

2021 to 2023 — excavation, then foundations. Out of the ground by April 2022, past ten storeys by January 2023.

Spring 2025 — leasing launches under the brand Skyla.

2025–26 — occupancy begins. Moxy Montréal opens in the podium.

December 2025 to June 2026 — a Canadian Architect Award of Excellence, RAIC recognition, and a Governor General's Medal in Architecture. Published by ArchDaily, Divisare, Canadian Architect and most of the rest.

August 2025 to September 2026 — sustained lease-up incentives: open-house weekends, up to three months free on select units, several hundred floorplans listed simultaneously across the rental portals. The Google rating settles at 3.2 out of 5 across 18 reviews.

The block

What got approved next door

• 800 Saint-Jacques, Place Banque Nationale (Broccolini) — built 2018–2023. 40 storeys, 200 m, roughly 93,000 m². Land bought January 2018 for about $100 million. Previously a parking lot.
• 700 Saint-Jacques, Victoria sur le Parc (Broccolini) — built 2019–2023, opened 2025. 58 storeys, 200 m, about 400 units.
• 900 Saint-Jacques (Canvar) — permit April 2021, built 2021–2026. 63 storeys, 200 m, 681–700 units plus a 216-key hotel.
• Former Terminus Mansfield (Broccolini) — preliminary green light March 2024. 200 m, about 664 units. A second phase contemplates a footbridge over the rails.

Who is actually working here

Broccolini holds three of the four files on this stretch. They are the dominant actor in this quadrant by a wide margin.

Groupe Canvar holds the subject site — downtown hotel-and-residential specialists since 1975.

Chevalier Morales is the design architect. A Montréal firm founded in 2005, about fifty staff, led by Stephan Chevalier and Sergio Morales, and considerably better known for libraries and museums than for rental towers.

Brian Elsden Burrows of Le Groupe Architex is the architect of record and executive architect. Architex's own project page describes the arrangement plainly: concept for the planning committee in collaboration with Chevalier Morales, execution by Groupe Architex. It is suggestive of how the redesign came together, though no public source states outright whether Chevalier Morales was brought onto the file before or after the committee demanded a design consultant.

BPDL supplied the precast, fabricating the architectural concrete panels with the windows integrated. NCK did structure, BPA mechanical and electrical, DesignAgency and Hager Design International the interiors and hospitality spaces.

And then the comité consultatif d'urbanisme de Ville-Marie — not a firm, but functionally the most consequential design actor on this entire file.

The turn

The turn on this block is the 10 March 2020 committee opinion, and it turns in an unusual direction: a design condition rather than a density concession.

Every other precedent on this stretch is about height. 700, 800 and the Mansfield site all reach the same 200-metre ceiling. Height was never really in dispute at 900 Saint-Jacques either — the PPU wanted density here, the lot could physically carry it, and Canvar had the ceiling available to them.

What the committee disputed was quality. And it used the leverage of an unissued permit to extract a redesign. The precedent it set is that on this stretch, the 200-metre envelope is available but it is not free: it has to be paid for in architecture and in unit mix.

Whether that precedent holds is testable. The Mansfield file across the street got its preliminary nod in March 2024, and will show soon enough whether the committee's 2020 posture was a policy or a mood.

Block timeline

January 2018 — Broccolini buys 800 Saint-Jacques, a parking lot, for roughly $100 million. The block's first real signal.

Over the next year, land values reprice. The PPU and the announced REM make this residual quadrant legible to capital for the first time since the 1960s.

2019 — Canvar acquires 900. Victoria sur le Parc breaks ground at 700.

March 2020 — the committee's opinion lands.

Over the following three years, three 200-metre towers rise within two blocks. The skyline of this quadrant is written in under five years.

March 2024 — Mansfield gets its preliminary approval. The last parking lot on the block enters the pipeline.

2025–26 — 700, 800 and 900 are all delivering and leasing into the same downtown submarket at the same time.

The city

What the plans said they wanted

The PPU Quartier des gares, adopted in 2016, takes a district long on infrastructure and short on anywhere worth walking to, and sets out to capitalise on its combination of transit proximity and vacant land — turning it into a walkable, cyclable, high-density neighbourhood mixing residential, business and hospitality uses.

The Plan d'urbanisme, §5.1.1, is the clause that shapes the skyline: borough regulation may not permit a height greater than the lesser of 232.5 metres above sea level or 200 metres. It also imposes a silhouette — buildings have to sit within the profile of the centre rather than spiking out of it.

The PUM 2050, adopted in 2025, removes the 200-metre roof cap and keeps the mont Royal restriction.

Policy changes that moved the value

• PPU Quartier des gares (2016) — value up. Designates the sector for high-density residential, which makes a 60-storey proposal a conversation rather than a non-starter.
• Planning committee design conditions (2020) — down short-term, up long-term. Redesign cost and delay, set against a durable asset now carrying three national awards. The precast envelope also performs roughly 25% better in winter than conventional glass — an operating-cost transfer straight to the owner.
• Règlement pour une métropole mixte, in force 1 April 2021 — value down. Roughly 20% social, 20% affordable and 20% family housing, or a financial contribution in lieu, as a condition of permit for projects over 450 m². Housing advocates documented developers racing to be permitted before it applied.
• The REM opening — value up. Killed the Mansfield bus terminus, freed the land across the street, and improved the transit case for the whole quadrant.
• RMM amendments (2024) and overhaul (1 April 2026) — up, for developers. Threshold raised to 18,000 m² residential; downtown office-to-residential conversions exempt until 31 December 2026; contributions eased.

Infrastructure and decision-makers

Bonaventure métro, Gare Centrale, Square-Victoria–OACI and the REM are all within a short walk. This is among the most transit-served parcels in the country.

The decisions are made by the comité consultatif d'urbanisme de Ville-Marie, advisory in theory and decisive in this case; the conseil d'arrondissement de Ville-Marie, which holds the power to grant a dérogation for excessive height; the borough's planning division; and, where a Plan d'urbanisme modification is required, the Comité Jacques-Viger, the city-level advisory body on design and urbanism. By convention, the mayor of Ville-Marie is the mayor of Montréal.

As for the market these towers landed in: three 200-metre residential and mixed-use buildings delivered into the same downtown submarket within about two years, with a fourth approved across the street. Listed rents at 900 span roughly $1,470 to $12,000 a month, and hundreds of floorplans have been listed simultaneously since the spring 2025 launch, alongside recurring offers of up to three months free.

City timeline

1992 — the first Plan d'urbanisme establishes the mont Royal height doctrine.

For the next twenty-four years, downtown height debates recur and the mountain rule holds through successive administrations.

2016 — PPU Quartier des gares.

January 2021 — the Règlement pour une métropole mixte is adopted, in force that April.

2021 — municipal election. Both leading candidates commit to protecting views of the mountain.

2000 to 2025 — buildings over 100 metres in Montréal more than double, from 32 to 73. Five towers approach the 200-metre ceiling in the mid-2020s: Victoria sur le Parc, Place Banque Nationale, Maestria, 1 Square Phillips, and Skyla.

2025 — PUM 2050 adopted; the 200-metre roof cap is removed.

1 April 2026 — the RMM is substantially rewritten.

The narrative

For sixty years, the corner of Saint-Jacques and de l'Inspecteur was a place to leave a car. The rail bridge out of Central Station runs along one edge; a Ville-Marie tunnel ramp curls along the other. When the business district walked northwest to Place Ville-Marie at the turn of the 1960s, and the expressway went through a decade later, this corner was left on the wrong side of everything. Nothing was built there because nothing could be. It was a hole, and Montréal grew around it.

In 2016 the city drew a line around the whole quadrant and called it the Quartier des gares, on the reasonable theory that land next to four train stations should not be storing cars. Three years later a family developer called Canvar bought the hole and filed a tower — sixty-two storeys, around eight hundred and ten apartments, fifty-two of them with two bedrooms, none at all with three.

In March 2020, Ville-Marie's planning advisory committee read those drawings and did something committees rarely do in writing. It said the building did not have the quality or the presence of the towers it would stand beside. It told the developer to go back to the drawing board and hire a design consultant. It asked for apartments a family could live in.

What came back is the building that stands there now. Slimmer, so it presses less against the protected view of the mountain. Wrapped not in glass but in sculpted precast concrete — panels cast with fine aggregate, using false joints and open corner panels and geometries that run past the edges of the modules, so that from the street the seams disappear and the whole surface reads more like textile than like a cladding system. It holds its own against Old Montréal greystone and Place Ville-Marie and the Château Champlain, which is precisely what it was told to do. It has since collected a Canadian Architect Award of Excellence and a Governor General's Medal. The permit was issued in April 2021, on a lot that had been empty since before the metro existed.

What it is now is a 200-metre building on a lot zoned for 200 metres. Every millimetre of the envelope used, nothing left on the table.

The city asked for a better building and got one. That is not a sentence anyone gets to write often, and it deserves saying plainly: an advisory committee with no binding power used the leverage of an unissued permit to turn a generic glass tower into the best thing built downtown in a decade.

It had no comparable leverage over anything that happens after a lease is signed. And that is where the reviews are.

The building leases under the name Skyla. Its Google rating, as of September 2026, is 3.2 out of 5 across eighteen reviews, and almost none of the complaints are about the concrete. Several reviewers are effusive about the views, the amenities, individual staff members by name. What the negative reviews describe is the leasing process — applicants who say they authorised a hard credit check at one rent and were then told they had been approved at a higher one; applicants describing weeks of document requests and deposits before being told the unit had been leased by a different agent in the same office.

And then the other complaint, the one that closes the loop on this entire site: residents reporting overnight rail maintenance, work on the tracks running roughly between ten at night and three in the morning, on no predictable schedule, with no meaningful response from management.

Read how the architectural press describes this building and you find the same line in every write-up. Rather than retreating from its infrastructural context, the project engages it directly. It transforms infrastructural adjacency into an asset. It builds a liveable microcosm within a landscape shaped by rail corridors and an expressway.

All true, architecturally. It is a genuinely impressive piece of urban judo. But the rail corridor is not a metaphor. It is a working line, and working lines get maintained at night, because that is when the trains aren't running.

The thing that made this lot worthless for sixty years did not stop existing when someone finally built on it. It just got a tenant.

We spent two years of public process getting the outside of this building right. Nobody was ever going to review the inside of the lease.

Sources

Provincial — Cadastre du Québec (MERN); Registre foncier du Québec; MELCCFP Répertoire des terrains contaminés.

Municipal — Ville de Montréal, Plan d'urbanisme §5.1.1 and Part II height maps, and the open dataset Plan d'urbanisme — Limites de hauteur; PUM 2050 (2025); Règlement pour une métropole mixte (20-041) and amending règlement 20-041-16; the open dataset Ententes conclues dans le cadre du Règlement pour une métropole mixte; Comité Jacques-Viger mandate and règlement 12-022.

Borough — PPU Quartier des gares (2016); Règlement d'urbanisme 01-282 and the Ville-Marie zoning fiche VM_4; conseil d'arrondissement ordre du jour and CCU avis, séance of 10 March 2020.

Press — André Dubuc, "Centre-ville : Montréal autorise la construction d'une tour de 63 étages," La Presse, 24 April 2021. Zacharie Goudreault, "Centre-ville : aucun logement familial dans un projet de 62 étages," Journal Métro, 11 March 2020. "Premier feu vert pour un nouveau gratte-ciel de 200 mètres," La Presse, 25 March 2024. "Les gratte-ciel seront-ils autorisés à dépasser le mont Royal ?," La Presse, 25 April 2021. "Le débat sur la hauteur des gratte-ciel à Montréal n'est pas clos," Radio-Canada, 21 September 2021. "Montréal modifie le règlement 20-20-20 pour donner un répit aux promoteurs," Radio-Canada, 14 March 2024. BCF, March 2021; BLG, April 2026.

Architectural — Chevalier Morales project page; Le Groupe Architex project page; Canadian Architect Awards of Excellence, December 2025; RAIC Governor General's Medals in Architecture 2026 jury citation; ArchDaily, 13 February 2026; Divisare; ArchiScene; ArchEyes; e-architect; Building; v2com press kit, February 2026.

Market — rentals.ca, PadMapper, Zumper, apartments.com, ApartmentHomeLiving, rentboard.ca, rentfaster.ca (Skyla listings, August 2025 to September 2026); skylamtl.com; Google Business Profile, Skyla Apartments, retrieved 14 September 2026.

Historical, identified but not yet consulted — BAnQ Numérique (Goad's atlas, Lovell's directories, permit cards); imtl.org construction photo series, 2021–2026.