You're accountable for a project you don't control, coordinating a design team, a GC, and a lender who each hold a different version of the truth. Bucky is the single record every party works from, and the one that remembers what was decided and why.
01 — BUCKY ADVANTAGES
02 — DELIVERABLES
03 — OBJECTIONS
I have Procore / a PM system.
Bucky exists the moment you have the address.
My consultants already do this analysis.
Bucky gives answers before you engage them.
Who's liable if the data is wrong?
Bucky shows every source, directly from the code.
How do we actually use this?
The same project carries the site from screening through feasibility, entitlement, and team formation. Start with one address. Add people only when that stage needs them — a viewer for a client, a stakeholder for a planner, a partner when you hire. Bucky is the pre-development record, not the construction job site.
Who gets added to a project?
You first. Add a colleague only if they will work in Bucky. Invite a client as a viewer, or send a share link. Track a planner or lender as a stakeholder without giving them a seat. Do not add the whole office on day one.
What's the best way to roll this out?
One champion, one live project, then one invite. Week two is when you decide whether anyone else needs a seat.